Search for: All records

Classical Mixtures of Experts (MoE) are Machine Learning models that involve partitioning the input space, with a separate "expert" model trained on each partition. Recently, MoE-based model architectures have become popular as a means to reduce training and inference costs. There, the partitioning function and the experts are both learnt jointly via gradient descent-type methods on the log-likelihood. In this paper we study theoretical guarantees of the Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm for the training of MoE models. We first rigorously analyze EM for MoE where the conditional distribution of the target and latent variable conditioned on the feature variable belongs to an exponential family of distributions and show its equivalence to projected Mirror Descent with unit step size and a Kullback-Leibler Divergence regularizer. This perspective allows us to derive new convergence results and identify conditions for local linear convergence; In the special case of mixture of 2 linear or logistic experts, we additionally provide guarantees for linear convergence based on the signal-to-noise ratio. Experiments on synthetic and (small-scale) real-world data supports that EM outperforms the gradient descent algorithm both in terms of convergence rate and the achieved accuracy. 

Fine-tuning a pre-trained model on a downstream task often degrades its original capabilities, a phenomenon known as "catastrophic forgetting". This is especially an issue when one does not have access to the data and recipe used to develop the pre-trained model. Under this constraint, most existing methods for mitigating forgetting are inapplicable. To address this challenge, we propose a sample weighting scheme for the fine-tuning data solely based on the pre-trained model's losses. Specifically, we upweight the easy samples on which the pre-trained model's loss is low and vice versa to limit the drift from the pre-trained model. Our approach is orthogonal and yet complementary to existing methods; while such methods mostly operate on parameter or gradient space, we concentrate on the sample space. We theoretically analyze the impact of fine-tuning with our method in a linear setting, showing that it stalls learning in a certain subspace which inhibits overfitting to the target task. We empirically demonstrate the efficacy of our method on both language and vision tasks. As an example, when fine-tuning Gemma 2 2B on MetaMathQA, our method results in only a 0.8% drop in accuracy on GSM8K (another math dataset) compared to standard fine-tuning, while preserving 5.4% more accuracy on the pre-training datasets. 

In pretraining data detection, the goal is to detect whether a given sentence is in the dataset used for training a Large Language Model LLM). Recent methods (such as Min-K % and Min-K%++) reveal that most training corpora are likely contaminated with both sensitive content and evaluation benchmarks, leading to inflated test set performance. These methods sometimes fail to detect samples from the pretraining data, primarily because they depend on statistics composed of causal token likelihoods. We introduce Infilling Score, a new test-statistic based on non-causal token likelihoods. Infilling Score can be computed for autoregressive models without re-training using Bayes rule. A naive application of Bayes rule scales linearly with the vocabulary size. However, we propose a ratio test-statistic whose computation is invariant to vocabulary size. Empirically, our method achieves a significant accuracy gain over state-of-the-art methods including Min-K%, and Min-K%++ on the WikiMIA benchmark across seven models with different parameter sizes. Further, we achieve higher AUC compared to reference-free methods on the challenging MIMIR benchmark. Finally, we create a benchmark dataset consisting of recent data sources published after the release of Llama-3; this benchmark provides a statistical baseline to indicate potential corpora used for Llama-3 training. 

We propose adaptive, line search-free second-order methods with optimal rate of convergence for solving convex-concave min-max problems. By means of an adaptive step size, our algorithms feature a simple update rule that requires solving only one linear system per iteration, eliminating the need for line search or backtracking mechanisms. Specifically, we base our algorithms on the optimistic method and appropriately combine it with second-order information. Moreover, distinct from common adaptive schemes, we define the step size recursively as a function of the gradient norm and the prediction error in the optimistic update. We first analyze a variant where the step size requires knowledge of the Lipschitz constant of the Hessian. Under the additional assumption of Lipschitz continuous gradients, we further design a parameter-free version by tracking the Hessian Lipschitz constant locally and ensuring the iterates remain bounded. We also evaluate the practical performance of our algorithm by comparing it to existing second-order algorithms for minimax optimization. 

A striking property of transformers is their ability to perform in-context learning (ICL), a machine learning framework in which the learner is presented with a novel context during inference implicitly through some data, and tasked with making a prediction in that context. As such, that learner must adapt to the context without additional training. We explore the role of softmax attention in an ICL setting where each context encodes a regression task. We show that an attention unit learns a window that it uses to implement a nearest-neighbors predictor adapted to the landscape of the pretraining tasks. Specifically, we show that this window widens with decreasing Lipschitzness and increasing label noise in the pretraining tasks. We also show that on low-rank, linear problems, the attention unit learns to project onto the appropriate subspace before inference. Further, we show that this adaptivity relies crucially on the softmax activation and thus cannot be replicated by the linear activation often studied in prior theoretical analyses.